The Impact of Recruitment Strategies and Crew Competencies on Maritime Operational Performance: A Study of PT Sillo Maritime Perdana Tbk
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59725/ema.v30i2.118Keywords:
PT Sillo Maritime Perdana Tbk, recruitment strategies, crew competencies, maritime operations, educational technologyAbstract
The maritime sector is critical for global trade and economic development, yet challenges in workforce development persist, particularly in tanker operations handling dry bulk cargo like agricultural products. This research investigates the interplay between recruitment strategies, crew competencies, and ship operational performance, with a focus on PT Sillo Maritime Perdana Tbk, a key player in Indonesia’s offshore shipping sector. Addressing gaps in aligning workforce development with industry demands, this study explores the effectiveness of recruitment practices and competency development within the operational context of this organization. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of recruitment strategies and crew work competencies, individually and collectively, on improving operational performance at PT Sillo Maritime Perdana Tbk. Using a mixed-methods approach, the research employed Statistical Equation Modeling (SEM) to analyze quantitative data from 117 participants and conducted thematic analysis of qualitative insights from experts, lecturers, graduates, and head workers. The results revealed that recruitment strategies and crew competencies significantly contribute to operational performance, with a combined positive effect observed. Structured recruitment and ongoing skill development tailored to industry demands were identified as critical. The findings also highlighted the transformative role of educational technology in bridging the gap between academic training and operational realities. The study provides actionable insights for PT Sillo Maritime Perdana Tbk and similar organizations, emphasizing the need for collaborative efforts to enhance workforce readiness, operational efficiency, and sustainability in maritime activities.
References
Bernadtua Simanjuntak, M., Sawitri Wulandari, R., Barasa, L., Soritua Sijabat, P., Mudakir, & Gunawan Malau, A. (2024). Challenges and sustainable economic strategies in global vegetable oil trade: A qualitative analysis of cadets in nautical and technical programs. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1379(1), 12029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1379/1/012029
Castleberry, A., & Nolen, A. (2018). Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds? Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10(6), 807–815.
Chen, Z., Awan, U., Nassani, A. A., Al-Aiban, K. M., & Zaman, K. (2025). Enhancing sustainable growth in the global south: The role of mineral resource management, supply chain efficiency, technology advancement, and local downstream processing. Resources Policy, 100(December 2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105451
Christodoulou-Varotsi, I., & Pentsov, D. A. (2008). The STCW Convention and related instruments. Maritime Work Law Fundamentals: Responsible Shipowners, Reliable Seafarers, 422–639.
Comtois, C., & Slack, B. (2017). Sustainable development and corporate strategies of the maritime industry. In Ports, Cities, and Global Supply Chains (pp. 249–262). Routledge.
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2011). Choosing a mixed methods design. In Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (pp. 53–106). Sage Publications, Inc.
Ferri, F., Grifoni, P., & Guzzo, T. (2020). Online learning and emergency remote teaching: Opportunities and challenges in emergency situations. Societies, 10(4), 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc10040086
House, D., & Saeed, F. (2016). The seamanship examiner: for STCW certification examinations. Taylor & Francis.
Jamil, M. G., & Bhuiyan, Z. (2021). Deep learning elements in maritime simulation programmes: a pedagogical exploration of learner experiences. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, 1–22.
Karakasnaki, M., Pantouvakis, A., & Vlachos, I. (2023). Maritime social sustainability: Conceptualization and scale development. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 121(December 2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2023.103804
Katz, J. (2015). A theory of qualitative methodology: The social system of analytic fieldwork. Méthod (e) s: African Review of Social Sciences Methodology, 1(1–2), 131–146.
Sharma, A., Kim, T., Nazir, S., & Chae, C. (2019). Catching up with time? Examining the STCW competence framework for autonomous shipping. Proceedings of the Ergoship Conference, Haugesund, Norway, 24–25.
Smith, C. M., & Shaw, D. (2019). The characteristics of problem structuring methods: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 274(2), 403–416.
Vieira, H., Almeida, M., Shafique, M. N., Leal, M. C., & Lillebø, A. I. (2025). Policy impacts of intellectual property and academic research trends in marine-derived collagen and chitin/chitosan value chains. Marine Policy, 173(November 2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106575
Young, C. (1995). Comprehensive Revision of the STCW convention: an overview. J. Mar. L. & Com., 26, 1.
Santoso, S., Kusnanto, E., & Saputra, M. R. (2022). Perbandingan metode pengumpulan data dalam penelitian kualitatif dan kuantitatif serta aplikasinya dalam penelitian akuntansi interpretatif. OPTIMAL Jurnal Ekonomi dan Manajemen, 2(3), 351-360.
